Ugly Houses: A Different Point of View 
by David B. South
 David B. South, President of the Monolithic Dome Institute |
As I was perusing the Monolithic Dome Builders Bulletin Board one day, I came across an interesting post regarding a presentation given by Dan Sutterfield, a Monolithic Dome Builder from Newburg, MO.
The portion of the post I am referring to is as follows:
posted 08-14-2002 11:08 AM Share YOUR thoughts on Ugly Houses...click hereMore letters from YOU regarding Ugly Houses are below. |
This got me thinking. What makes a house beautiful? What makes it ugly?
If it's true that Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, is ugliness
there too? In other words, do we judge something, like a house, to be either
beautiful or ugly simply by how it looks? Or are our judgments based on how
the house makes us feel and what it does for us?
I think the latter is true.
To me, houses that are truly ugly are shelters that don't really shelter.
I recently made up this list of ugly qualities a house might have.
Read it over and see if you agree. Let me know if you have one or two you
would like added.
Ugly Houses
- Give a false sense of security
- Burn-- destroying lives, families and keepsakes
- Blow away in tornadoes
- Get flattened by earthquakes
- Disappear during a hurricane
- Float during a flood
- Rot after a flood
- Allow wind to blow through without any air control
- Do not hold sounds out
- Do not contain interior sounds
- Are not soundproof
- Harbor and provide food for mold
- Can be eaten by termites and other pests
- Lose their roofs
- Develop foundation and wall cracks when the ground shifts under them
- Consume high amounts of energy
- Require expensive repairs and maintenance
- Have load bearing walls that limit remodeling
- Have to have high ceilings added in at vaulted prices
- Have a short lifetime -- often less than 50 years
- Use up our forests
- Deplete our fuel reserves
- Cannot be recycled to be used as something else
- Have an unnatural shape or artificial look
- Make people feel boxed in
- Are the homes of the past, not the future
Your Comments...
- 03/10/08 An ugly house is a death trap waiting for the right conditions to snare it's occupants. A beautiful house protects them instead. Fire, tornado, earthquake, vehicular impact; none of these are any particular concern to a monolithic home owner. Houses built out of hundreds of pieces of wood only temporarily held together by blind nails are ancient technology. They rot. They attract pests. They blow apart under severe weather events. They shake apart in earthquakes. They are built out of flammable materials, potentially trapping and incinerating the very occupants they should be protecting. There's nothing beautiful about that. A monolithic, steel-reinforced, super-insulated concrete home is the way of the future. No need for FEMA with houses like that. Go to bed and sleep without a worry even under a tornado warning or during a hurricane. They can't burn, because they aren't made out of flammable materials. A house should be a shelter instead of a threat in all situations; why build a house that could eventually contribute to killing you, when you can build a house that would provide protection for you under the same circumstances? Now that's beautiful. - Danny, Ontario
- 06/10/07 A house that is built from non-sustainable building materials. Any house that will not stand for more than three hundred years with out major rebuilding. Any house that does not have a natural flow and lack of right angles, is an UGLY house to me. I guess my train of thought has always leaned toward a more organic looking structure. From a very early age I could never understand why, when we are born, we come from the perfect Organic Form and are immediately placed into a box. Then put into a box looking car, taken home to a box, and eventually buried...IN A BOX! My taste in homes starts with an Earth Ship and grows steadily more enraptured until a total organic form is realized. The monolithic dome is in the top two best structures I have ever seen. The others are built by artistic types who build from their minds and not a set of plans. - Paul
- 02/13/07 I frequently wince when I walk by them--the multi-gabled houses pretending to be McMansions. Even a small house may have four or five wierd gables that add nothing but unnecessary cost. The bigger "mansions" are equally ugly and even more wasteful because there are more and bigger useless gables. And of course the monotony of repetition enhances the ugliness. - Mary of Michigan
- 02/09/07 No matter how much money you pour into it, it's still ugly! You can add insulation (fiberglass of course!) and add new efficient windows, caulk all openings and put in a radiant barrier. New AC, heater and replace all lights with florescent. Dig a trench around the house and fill in with pretty river rock to keep the termintes and bugs at bay. Spend $50,000 to replace board rot with Hardee board and paint with the best paint. Sounds of jets from the Air Force base nearby, cars on streets, lawn mowers, music from oversized pickup's and dogs barking at the mailman still permeates this expensive home. Even with all that, it's still a 30 year old house that can still burn, flood, mildew, mold, be blown away or just plain age with time. How ugly is that? - Gary of Houston
- 02/09/07 Enjoyed the Article on "Ugly House". Seems the gentleman from Missouri has it well defined. I often say there are two types of homes: a dome home or a dumb home. Best Wishes, Larry
- 04/10/07 To borrow (& reword) a phrase from my wonderful Scottish friends, (said with thick Scottish accent)
"If it's not Monolithic, it's CRAP!"
Seriously though, if it's not efficient, it's ugly! Wasted natural resources are ugly! Not having Monolithic Domes for sale where I want to buy a house is ugly!! Who on earth wants to settle for some inefficient storage box to live in when there's beautiful, efficient, secure, cozy, & environmentally friendly MONOLITHIC DOMES to live in! (especially in Florida where I live - why there's anything BUT Monolithic Dome construction going on here of all places is quite beyond me) You know, I went to several of the most popular real estate sites online and not one of them has a search function for Monolithic Domes??? That's ugly! The thought of paying off a 30 year mortgage on a home that might not last long enough to leave to my heirs is ugly too...
Those are some of my thoughts on the matter... Feel free to use any, all or none of that as you please ;).
Brightest Blessings, Lisa
- 04/24/07 An ugly house is when people keep on insisting in rebuilding old stick
designs AGAIN and again in the same spot where a river flood or a
hurricane happened. When will people learn to build something more
durable in a different and higher location?
An ugly house is when you spend more time and weekends fixing and repairing the house than you do living in it!
An ugly house is when you see your electric bill soaring higher every year and the electric companies are laughing at the extra profits they made.
An ugly house is when someone spends 4 Million Dollars or more on a boxmansion next to a sandy cliff near the beach, and gets to watch it split in half during rain storms or earthquakes. Only to rebuild it again...at more expense.
Most people have forgotten the old proverbs....
A foolish man builds his house on the sand...The wise man builds his house on a rock (or a solid foundation)...
Too many square homes that have been wiped out by storms and high winds. People forget that box homes are NOT aerodynamic, and the wind will push in the walls. For proof, just hold a boxy milk carton out the car window, and see how much resistance and force is on the flat walls...
The Dome is the only way to go....Aerodynamic, Strong, Smooth, More efficient, lower cost, Organic looking, and Can be made very beautiful. What is even more beautiful is the low priced energy bill and the durability of the home... long after the neighbors have wasted millions rebuilding their box homes again and again and again....The Dome is the future. The box home is an outdated concept from the Old Pioneering West.....Eric
|